Smart meter technology is relatively new and untested. We are being used as the guinea pigs. Fortunately there are many people researching and providing information about their effects on us. This blog is an attempt to provide resources about the meters as well as information specific to Pennsylvania. Use the links in the sidebars to find informative websites, videos, studies and articles that I have found to be helpful, as well as information specific to PA residents. Some links, such as the Amazon store, will potentially bring a minimal amount of money to the site owner, which will be used to fund flyers, etc for spreading the word about smart meters.

Friday, June 21, 2013

What we can do...

[note 7/2/13 : see update at bottom of this post, 7/4/13 see update on Act 129 below]

I am no expert on the laws, but this is what I have learned about why we are being subjected to having these smart meters installed, and also what actions we can take at this time to protect ourselves through the legal system.

Federal law enacted in 2005 required the electric utility companies to provide time-based meters to customers requesting a time-based rate...i.e. smart meters.

Energy Policy Act of 2005

bottom of page 371

SEC. 1252. SMART METERING.
(a)IN GENERAL.—Section 111(d) of the Public Utility Regulatory
Policies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2621(d)) is amended by adding
at the end the following:
‘‘(14) TIME-BASED  METERING  AND  COMMUNICATIONS.—(A)
Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this
paragraph, each electric utility shall offer each of its customer
classes, and provide individual customers upon customer
request, a time-based rate schedule under which the rate
charged by the electric utility varies during different time
periods and reflects the variance, if any, in the utility’s costs
of generating and purchasing electricity at the wholesale level.
The time-based rate schedule shall enable the electric consumer
to manage energy use and cost through advanced metering
and communications technology.


and further down...

‘‘(C) Each electric utility subject to subparagraph (A) shall
provide each customer requesting a time-based rate with a
time-based meter capable of enabling the utility and customer
to offer and receive such rate, respectively.



In 2008, Pennsylvania enacted Act 129, part of which states...


 (2)  Electric distribution companies shall furnish smart
        meter technology as follows:
                (i)  Upon request from a customer that agrees to pay
            the cost of the smart meter at the time of the request.
                (ii)  In new building construction.
                (iii)  In accordance with a depreciation schedule not
            to exceed 15 years.


Although the federal law appears to require smart meter installation only for those customers requesting them, the state law in PA does not provide that option.(update 7/4/13 This is what I've been told. I am looking into this more as I am not quite convinced that this is true.)

Many states now allow for customers to opt-out of these technologies. Pennsylvania should, too!

In 2011-12 and again in 2013, Rep. Mike Reese introduced three bills that would protect our rights as energy consumers. These bills are sitting in committee, waiting for Rep. Robert W. Godshall (Consumer Affairs Chairman) to find it in his heart to allow these bills to move ahead on their path to becoming law. It is up to us to provide the impetus for this to happen.

Even if you are not objecting to this technology, or are not sure yet if you do, it is in our best interests to have our rights and privacy protected in this way.

At the moment, in June of 2013, the House of Representatives is focused on bills relating to budget concerns and will not review these bills until sessions resume in the fall. That gives us time to contact our representatives and get our voices heard.

The three bills are as follows...

HB 899 Repeal of Smart Meter Mandate

It reads, in part...

I am of the opinion that although smart meters may be a technology that has advantages, no government body should mandate their usage. Such a mandate jeopardizes common principles of supply and demand.

This legislation, one of three bills addressing smart meter technology that I intend to introduce, would simply remove language that requires energy companies to provide smart meters while still allowing companies to offer the technology should they choose.



HB 902 Consumer “Opt-Out” of Smart Meter Usage

It reads, in part...

I and other legislators have been contacted by constituents that have expressed their desire to not have smart meter technology at their homes or businesses. Their concerns range from securing sensitive and personal information to the health impacts of radio frequency (RF) waves. My perspective is one that questions if a government mandate was appropriate at all.

This legislation, one of three bills addressing smart meter technology that I intend to introduce, would provide consumers the ability to “opt-out” of having a smart meter and require the Pennsylvania Utility Commission to create a fair surcharge system that would be paid by these consumers. This is similar to laws recently passed in Maine, Nevada and California.


(I want to mention here that many object to the surcharge for opting out, and I will try to get more information on that. In the meantime, if this bothers you too, you might want to mention your objection to that aspect of the bill when you contact your representative.)

HB 906 Consumer Consent to Share Smart Meter Information

It reads, in part...

Part of this mandate is the requirement that, with customer consent, power companies provide direct meter access or meter data to third parties including electric generation suppliers and providers of conservation and load management services. While it makes sense for certain third parties to have access to data necessary to ensure that consumers are billed properly for the services they receive, I am concerned about this information being shared with government agencies without prior consent.

This legislation, one of three bills addressing smart meter technology that I intend to introduce, will ensure that customer consent is required before an electric distribution company may share customer meter data or provide meter access to a government agency.



Rep. Reese's office has suggested that we each contact our local state reps and ask them to co-sponser these bills when they return to work in the fall. Also, ask that they speak candidly to Rep. Godshall and insist that he push these bills through the committee (of which he is the chairman) for a vote on the house floor. With enough representatives backing these bills, it will send a clear message to Rep. Godshall that the people of Pennsylvania expect to be properly represented and protected by our elected representatives. A call to Rep. Godshall might also be something to do, but the most important thing would be to get as much support for these bills as possible.

You can find your local representative here...Find Your Legislator


And if you are so inclined...Rep. Godshall's information is here... link



Thank you. Please spread the word and share this with as many people as you can.
Post a comment as well when you do, so we can all know that people are taking action!

[added 7-2-13... I have found that there are also three bills in the Senate introduced by Sen. Donald C. White. They are SB816 SB817 SB818
Click the links to see them. More updates on this post to come soon. ]
 

5 comments:

  1. I did not realize the loose wording on 899. It gives the power to the utility company and not to the consumer. Since utility companies have already accepted monies/bait from the PUC to install SM's, I highly doubt that the consumer will have a choice from that aspect,so as far as I can see, this bill does not protect the consumer at all. Bill 902 protects the consumer but only in a limited capacity...the ability to opt-out, yes, but with the probability of paying (high?) penalties. Of course, 906 goes without saying. The legislative language in these bills demonstrates the typical non-committal way politicians conduct business, ultimately allowing for intentional misinterpretation down-the-road. I highly suggest that we get our reps to co-sponsor 'all three bills' or we do not have a shot in hell to be saved from the fall-out of the implementation of this most dangerous technology.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you again for your comment. I just want to clarify something about HB899...the effect of the bill would be to change the wording on a law that is already in place, Act 129. The fact that the law states that the utilities "shall" furnish smart meter technologies is the problem. HB 899 would change the wording on that law to "may" and that makes a tremendous difference for us all. You can see the law with the changes that would be implemented here...

      http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&sessYr=2013&sessInd=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=0899&pn=1040

      Delete
  2. Is anyone interested in staging protest in Harrisburg? I for one won't be allowing a "dumb meter" on my house, I'm sure I'm not alone in my determination. I think even 50 people would be a good showing, I'm just curious if the proprietor of this blog would be interested in promoting such an event.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This would be great! Please send me a direct message through the contact box on the right side of this blog. Thanks.

      Delete
    2. I would join a protest and bring 3 more people with. I don't want a smart meter and certainly don't want to pay for one nor a penalty for not.

      Delete